Associated Joint Pain With Controlled Ankle Movement Walker Boot Wear (2024)

Abstract

Foot and ankle injuries often require management with a controlled ankle movement (CAM) walker boot.^1,2,3,4,5,6 CAM walker boots restrict ankle and foot motion and provide a stable platform to distribute forces when weight bearing. Most CAM walker boots are designed to tighten around the extremity and allow the patient to rollover the foot when walking because of the rocker bottom shape of the sole. Thus, CAM walker boots shelter the ankle and foot and can permit a return to ambulation with continued protection of the injured extremity.

Although CAM walker boots are commonly used in the rehabilitation of orthopaedic patients, their use is not entirely benign. Studies have shown altered gait biomechanics created by restricting ankle and foot function. Goodworth et al⁷ reported increased body motion in patients who undergo range of motion and balance testing when wearing the rocker bottom design. Furthermore, the use of a unilateral walking boot creates a simulated leg-length discrepancy, a condition linked to joint pain.^{7,8,9,10,11,12,13}

To date, little has been published evaluating the association of CAM walker boot wear with pain occurring at a site other than that requiring boot treatment, the so-called secondary site pain. Anecdotally, we have observed many patients reporting secondary site lower back or lower extremity pain when wearing a CAM walker boot. This study evaluates the location, frequency, and duration of secondary site musculoskeletal pain related to immobilization in a CAM walker boot.

Methods

Results

One hundred patients were invited to participate in this study. Of these, 3 declined initial participation, 36 did not complete all surveys, and 15 were excluded because they did not wear the CAM walker boot for 2 weeks or had a change in treatment. The final study population included 46 patients, of whom 15 were men (33%) and 31 women (67%) with a mean age of 49 years (range, 22 to 77 years). Most patients (85%) were Caucasian (Table ​(Table11).

The diagnosis requiring CAM walker boot treatment was a fracture in 17 patients (37%), a sprain in 7 patients (15%), and a tendon disorder in 17 patients (37%). Five patients (11%) were treated with a boot for a gastrocnemius strain, stress reaction, plantar plate injury, or plantar fascia rupture (Table ​(Table1).1). Thirty-one patients were treated with a tall CAM boot and 15 with a short boot. Mean duration of boot wear was 4.2 weeks (range, 2 to 9 weeks), wearing the boot for a mean of 6.5 (range, 3 to 7) days per week for an average of 11.6 (range, 3 to 23) hours per day.

At the time of initiation of boot wear, 27 patients (59%) reported one or more secondary site pains. Among these 27 patients, a total of 50 secondary site pains were reported. The most frequent baseline pain sites were the lower back, ipsilateral knee, and contralateral hip. At baseline, the mean VAS of secondary site pain was 53.1 (range, 3 to 97).

At the time of transition out of the boot, 31 patients (67%) reported secondary site pain which was either new or worse than at baseline. Of these, 13 reported pain at a new secondary site and 18 reported worsening of baseline secondary site pain. Seventeen of these patients experienced new or worsening pain in the lower back, 4 the ipsilateral hip, 11 the contralateral hip, 10 the ipsilateral knee, 8 the contralateral knee, 2 the contralateral ankle, and 1 the contralateral foot (Figure ​(Figure1).1). Of those with new or worsened secondary site pain, each patient experienced an average of 1.6 secondary sites of pain at the time of transitioning out of the boot.

One month after transitioning out of the boot, 18 patients (39%) reported persistent secondary site pain which had developed during boot wear and was either new or worse than at baseline. Three months after transitioning out of the boot, 15 patients (33%) reported persistent secondary site pain. Of these, 12 had reported secondary site pain at baseline. Thus, 48% of those in whom secondary site pain developed while wearing the boot still had secondary site pain 3 months after cessation of boot wear.

Most (84%) of the new or worsened secondary site pains began within the first 2 weeks of boot wear. Of patients' secondary site pains, 34 sites caused little to no limitation, 21 some limitation, 10 quite a lot of limitation, and 4 complete limitation of the patient’s usual activities. Mean VAS for secondary site pains at the time of transition out of the boot was 51.2 (range, 4 to 98). One month after coming out of the boot, mean VAS was 57.4 (range, 16 to 100) and at 3 months after boot wear, mean VAS was 43.2 (range, 15 to 99).

In 22 patients with a history of lower back or lower extremity pain, new or worsened secondary site pain developed in 16 of them during boot wear. Secondary site pain developed in all enrolled patients with a history of chronic pain (8/8) and in one patient who smoked cigarettes. No statistically significant correlation exists between the development of secondary site pain and sex, age, race or ethnicity, BMI, diagnosis, history of lower back or lower extremity injury, smoking, use of tall or short boot, or duration of boot wear. However, statistical significance was found correlating secondary site pain with a history of chronic pain (Table ​(Table22).

Discussion

The severity and frequency of secondary site pain related to immobilization in a CAM walker boot are yet to be evaluated in the literature. In this study, 67% of patients treated with a CAM walker boot for at least 2 weeks reported new or worsened secondary site pain at the time of transition out of the boot. On average, each of these patients experienced 1.6 secondary pain sites. The reasons for secondary site pain during CAM walker boot wear are likely multifactorial and could be related to boot design, altered gait mechanics, or simulated leg-length discrepancy.

Most CAM walker boots have a rocker bottom sole, which is designed to facilitate roll-through during ambulation. The advantage of this is to shield the ankle and foot during the gait cycle. Yet, this can lead to alterations in balance and an altered postural response during gait.^17-19 Furthermore, decreasing ankle range of motion diminishes proprioceptive feedback through the lower extremity, resulting in abnormal kinematics at other more proximal joints.⁷

CAM walker boots also create a simulated leg-length discrepancy.⁷ Leg-length inequality can cause abnormal joint forces and motion in the lower extremity. Physiologic compensation to leg-length discrepancy occurs, including bending of the longer-leg knee, which adds pressure to the lateral patellofemoral articulation.²⁰ Additionally, the pelvis can tip and become lower on the shorter side, decreasing the femoral head coverage on the longer side.¹⁰ The short-sided foot externally rotates, repositioning the heel into valgus and collapsing the longitudinal arch.¹² Rotation of the longer limb has also been implicated in progressive scoliotic curvature, which may lead to development of lower back pain.^{21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28} Betsch et al⁹ illustrated that an artificial leg-length inequality of just 15 mm can lead to changes in pelvic tilt, torsion, and spinal posture. Long-term effects of limb-length inequality include the development of arthritis of the hip and lower back pain.²⁹

We can draw several conclusions about the timing and severity of pain onset related to CAM walker boot wear. Most (84%) of the new or worsened secondary site pains began within the first 2 weeks of wearing the boot. And, although it did not reach statistical significance, we observed a trend of those spending a longer time in the boot having more frequent and severe pain. With respect to recovery after transitioning out of the boot, 52% of patients' new or worsened secondary site pain completely resolved by 3 months after ceasing boot wear. The mean severity of pain, as measured by patient-reported VAS, initially worsened after ceasing boot wear and then demonstrated a trend of improvement by 3 months. Taken together, these findings suggest a dose-related effect of boot wear, with longer use correlated to more frequent secondary site symptoms and a gradual subsequent recovery after the patient no longer requires the boot.

In this study, patients with a history of chronic pain were at particular risk for development of secondary site pain. Although we additionally noted an increased relative risk of secondary site pain in other subgroups, these analyses did not reach statistical significance. Patients with a history of chronic pain who require CAM walker boot treatment might warrant additional counseling about the risks of pain related to boot wear.

In this study, the lower back was the most common secondary pain site, followed by the contralateral hip and ipsilateral knee. These sites were also the most common baseline secondary pain sites. These data suggest that although secondary site pain can develop at new sites while wearing a CAM walker boot, preexisting secondary pain sites are particularly likely to be exacerbated. The contralateral ankle and foot were not frequent secondary pain sites.

Limitations of this study include its small sample size and that only 46% of patients who met inclusion criteria completing all surveys. It is possible that those responding to the surveys in full were more, or less, likely than the general population to have secondary site pain. The patient-reported nature of the surveys also generates a potential response bias, although the subjective nature of pain necessitates a study design that is based on patient reporting. Another limitation is the wide range of hours per day that the CAM walker boot was worn by patients. It is possible that patients may have modified the duration of boot wear to minimize secondary site pain. If this was the case, it would likely have the effect of diminishing the severity of reported secondary site pain. We did not address this possible occurrence in our surveys or the possibility that foot shape and alignment contributed to the boot experience. Additionally, we cannot be certain that the boot wear was causative of the secondary site pain, because patients in this study did have a lower extremity injury or disorder. It is plausible that the altered gait contributing to the secondary site pain may have been because of the injury more than the boot itself.

Additional research into the relationship between CAM walker boot wear and secondary site pain may further define the effects of the boot as opposed to the injury. It would be beneficial to further evaluate the leg-length discrepancy and variation in gait experienced by patients wearing a CAM walker boot. Wearing a heel or a shoe lift on the contralateral extremity would theoretically eliminate the leg-length discrepancy and may minimize the frequency of secondary site pain. It would also be of interest to evaluate the secondary site pain at 6 months and a year to determine if the symptoms resolved.

Given the frequency with which CAM walker boots are prescribed, it is important to understand the association between boot wear and secondary site pain. In our practice, patients frequently inquire about whether a CAM walker boot will cause or exacerbate pain. Because of the results of this study, we are now better able to counsel patients and are more likely to recommend devices that balance the leg lengths when wearing a boot or use crutches to assist with pain.

Conclusion

Sixty-seven percent of patients included in this study experienced new or worsened secondary site pain during CAM walker boot wear for a lower extremity injury or disorder. The sites most susceptible to secondary pain were the lower back, contralateral hip, and ipsilateral knee. Although the frequency and severity of secondary site pain improved with time after transitioning out of the boot, one-third of patients had persistent secondary site pain 3 months after cessation of boot wear.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jamie E. Collins, PhD, for help with the statistical analysis.

Footnotes

References